When you think of any kind of gov-stamped report that’s talking about Scottish startups or the broader ecosystem, you roughly know what to expect.

You can expect a premise of empiricy – or, at least, confident statements that read like axiomatic truths: “Scotland… hosts effective investment syndicate networks and VC firms,” says the Scottish Tech Ecosystem Review; “The Scottish digital technologies sector has an impressive reputation globally,” says A Changing Nation – how Scotland will Thrive in a Digital World.

There’s absolutely nothing wrong with these statements and the reports they come from have been undoubtedly seminal in reshaping Scotland’s technological and digital orientation, post-covid. But, these are documents meant to have the biggest possible impact to the most amount of people and have an inherent MO to present a positive case – or at least a spin that can be interpreted as positive.

On the other hand, it’s so hard to get a grasp of what people who are working within the Scottish startup ecosystem are actually thinking, or what their outcomes look like on the back of dense policy reports like the ones I’ve referenced before. Outside the sprawl of LinkedIN – where you’re getting a such a mixed bag of opinion, with varied levels of informedness, readability and coherence – it’s so hard to get a tangible grasp on the day-to-day discourse.

Though not based on surveys or hard numerical data, can face-to-face conversations provide insight into the challenges that some of our startup owners, employees and proponents are facing?

While in isolation, a sit down or two with your pal who owns a startup is hardly going to paint you any kind of picture you can take to the bank.

However, Barry McDonald – a huge proponent of the Scottish tech and startup ecosystem, having worked within CodeBase for many years, working in the strategic development of many, many programmes and initiatives (including Techscaler) – has decided to take a novel approach to the problem.

The premise was simple. McDonald posted on LinkedIn inviting anyone with a connection to Scotland’s entrepreneurial world to sit down for a coffee – whether in person or online – and talk. There were no set questions, no structured interviews – and thus, 100 Conversations: Challenges and Opportunities in the Scottish Startup Ecosystem came to fruition.

“Every one of the 100 coffee participants volunteered their time and reached out to me,” McDonald explains. “Whether this paints an accurate picture of the ecosystem is up for debate, but it did mean that people whose views often go unheard had a listening ear.”

The anonymity of participants was deliberate. McDonald wanted candid insights, free from political posturing or fear of reputational risk. As a result, the report is peppered with direct quotes that seek to cut through the noise and get to the heart of something a bit more candid than a gov report, and probably more measured and considered than a LinkedIN post – when you think of it in those terms, it’s pretty easy to get on board with McDonald’s premise.

“I am simply representing a snapshot of the ecosystem’s views,” he writes. “What follows is the opinions, thoughts and lived experience of 100 people who I shared a coffee and conversation with.”

A Positive Future — But a Fragmented Present

One of the key takeaways from McDonald’s conversations is that despite frustrations, the mood is broadly optimistic. There is strong belief in Scotland’s potential to grow a world-class startup ecosystem – but also recognition that structural issues are holding it back.

“Over the course of 100 conversations with founders, funders, ecosystem builders, and changemakers across Scotland, one message came through loud and clear: Scotland has the talent, ideas, and ambition, but our startup ecosystem is too fragmented, too complicated, and too inward-looking to reach its full potential.”

The report highlights that while support structures exist – accelerators, grants, incubators, networking events – they are often duplicative, confusing, and poorly connected. Founders repeatedly described the experience of navigating Scotland’s ecosystem as “overwhelming” and “opaque.”

“If someone could draw a simple, visual map of who’s doing what, how to engage, and in what order,” one founder told McDonald, “I’d print it and put it on my wall.”

Despite the compelling arguments for the often obfuscatory framework of startup support in this country, there’s plenty data to support the broad optimism among the ecosystem, especially through the first quarter of 2025 when twenty-six investments were concluded in Scotland.

Having raised £92.3 million in the final quarter of 2024, business in the region received £91.7 million from VC investors in the first three months of this year – a slight dip of 0.6%.

The largest raise was for Blk Global, a Glasgow-based online commodity and industrial supplies marketplace, which raised £50 million, and drove the business-to-business products and services sector’s dominance in deal values across Scotland.

Other key deals included a £13.4 million investment in Edinburgh-based IONATE, which is developing grid-scale power technology to support the net zero transition.

These headline-grabbing raises highlight the ambition and momentum within Scotland’s tech sector — but they don’t tell the whole story. Behind the investment figures lie structural issues and everyday frustrations that continue to hold founders back. It’s these challenges, surfaced through Barry McDonald’s 100 coffee conversations, that reveal the other side of the ecosystem.

Five Challenges That Need to be Addressed

A Maze of Support Services

McDonald’s conversations revealed a consistent frustration with the disjointed nature of support organisations. New founders, in particular, can spend months simply figuring out which accelerator, programme, or agency is relevant to them.

As mentioned earlier, there is also significant duplication across public, private, and third-sector initiatives, with little collaboration or shared intelligence. Services offered by enterprise agencies like Scottish Enterprise (SE), Highlands and Islands Enterprise (HIE), and Business Gateway vary drastically by location, leaving rural founders particularly disadvantaged.

A Lack of Shared Vision

Another recurring theme was Scotland’s lack of a coherent national strategy for entrepreneurship. There is no unified answer to the question: what is the country trying to achieve?

“There’s no clear answer to the question: What are we trying to build? More unicorns? More sustainable SMEs? More successful exits? More locally-rooted, regenerative businesses? Different goals require different playbooks, but right now, everyone’s playing a different game.”

This lack of direction leads to what McDonald calls a “patchwork of initiatives” – well-meaning but rarely aligned with the real needs of founders.

Risk Aversion and Investment Gaps

Access to capital – especially at the pre-seed and seed stages – is another persistent barrier. Participants repeatedly described Scottish investors as risk-averse, often waiting to back “winning horses about to cross the finish line” rather than taking bold bets on early-stage ideas.

Angel and VC funding is often focused on companies that are already de-risked, while alternative funding models like revenue-based finance, patient capital, or crowdfunding remain underdeveloped.

Grant Culture and Short-Term Thinking

McDonald notes a culture of dependency on public funding, with a “side-industry” of consultants helping startups navigate grant applications – sometimes without delivering real growth outcomes. Short funding windows (e.g., “spend by March” deadlines) make long-term planning difficult.

Inclusion Gaps

Inclusivity is a stated goal of the ecosystem, but many founders feel shut out. Rural entrepreneurs, disabled founders, international talent, and those outside traditional high-growth sectors all reported barriers to accessing support.

“Scotland’s size is its superpower,” McDonald writes, “but only if we use it to build a more connected, inclusive ecosystem.”

Community: The Missing Heartbeat

Another recurring theme was the erosion of founder communities.

“Peer support has eroded — once-vibrant founder networks have faded or become diluted,” McDonald observes. He later laments that “the community is increasingly transactional, often built around funding announcements or demo days rather than genuine peer support.”

Founders want authentic spaces – both online and offline – where they can ask questions, test ideas, and share experiences without fear of judgment. Rural founders, in particular, reported a lack of both in-person and virtual communities. International founders described the ecosystem as a “tight-knit, often opaque system”, making integration difficult.

“The biggest challenge is maintaining community,” one participant told McDonald. “It’s the only thing AI can’t really solve and it’ll be the biggest challenge of them all.”

Cultural Barriers and Fear of Failure

Scotland’s entrepreneurial culture, according to McDonald’s conversations, remains hamstrung by fear of failure and an overly modest mindset.

“The biggest blocker to innovation in Scotland? The fear of failure,” one voice stated.

“We’re too humble,” another added. “Scotland has a great brand and we need to do better to leverage international opportunities, particularly in the USA and Asia.”

The report also notes toxic behaviours – subtle gatekeeping, outdated “pay your dues” attitudes, and a narrow view of who counts as a “real” founder. Rivalries between cities and resistance to change from the “old guard” add to the sense of cultural inertia.

Education: A Missed Opportunity

One of the report’s most pointed critiques is aimed at Scotland’s education system. Despite nearly every Scot passing through the school system, entrepreneurship remains largely invisible.

“School is the one thing that almost every person does, so if we’re serious about an entrepreneurial culture/economy, this has to be a huge priority,” one participant argued. “Entrepreneurship is about freedom, innovation and leveraging customer choice… while our education system tends to prize consistency and standardisation.”

University spinouts face similar challenges. While Scotland’s universities are rich in research and intellectual property, rigid IP policies and a lack of commercial expertise make it difficult to translate innovation into viable ventures.

Opportunities: Building a Founder-First Ecosystem

Despite noting flaws within the ecosystem, McDonald’s report is far from pessimistic. In fact, it highlights an ecosystem brimming with potential – if key opportunities are seized.

1. Alternative, Founder-Friendly Funding

McDonald calls for a broader funding landscape, including crowdfunding, non-dilutive grants, and revenue-based financing. Clearer guidance for founders on which funding sources are relevant – and when to pursue them – could significantly reduce the “signal-to-noise” problem many founders face.

“Getting 500+ results when you search for funding is completely demoralising,” one founder told him, “especially when you can’t filter it to remove all the chaff that doesn’t apply to you.”

2. Unlocking Underused Talent

Scotland has a wealth of experienced professionals – from academia, corporates, and industry – who could add value to startups, but early-stage ventures struggle to access this expertise due to funding constraints. There’s an opportunity to better connect this talent with emerging companies.

3. Starting Younger

The report advocates treating entrepreneurship like a core skill, not a fringe activity. “A 17-year-old with the right tools could build a globally relevant company,” McDonald notes, calling for more competitions, summer schools, and early exposure to entrepreneurship.

4. Reimagining Universities

With their research output, talent, and infrastructure, Scotland’s universities are natural startup engines – but they need to open up, collaborate, and rethink how they engage with the startup world.

5. Building Meaningful Communities

Founders don’t want more shallow networking events; they want authentic spaces and curated introductions that lead to real partnerships. “We have some great people trying to support the community,” one participant observed, “and I wonder what would happen if they joined forces and we unleashed their collective power!”

Recommended reading

• Techscaler One Year In: Hit or Miss?
• Nearly 100 Dundee and Tayside Firms Join Techscaler
• Swinney Pledges Support for Deep Tech, Goes All in On Techscaler

6. Normalising Failure

Cultural change is critical. McDonald argues that failure must be seen as part of the learning process. “Too many founders feel like they’re one mistake away from being written off,” he says.

A Shared Vision for a Small but Mighty Nation

McDonald believes Scotland’s small size is not a weakness but a potential advantage — if the ecosystem can overcome its fragmentation and city rivalries. Events like Turing Fest show that Scotland can convene international audiences, but the country needs more global-scale, founder-first initiatives.

“Less ego. Less noise,” McDonald writes. “With clearer leadership, better coordination, and a vision built around people — not processes — we could build a truly world-class, founder-first ecosystem.”

The report closes not with prescriptive solutions, but with an invitation to continue the conversation.

“What I heard was clear: Scotland has the talent, the ambition, and the raw ingredients to build a world-class startup ecosystem. But too often, we get in our own way,” McDonald says.

“If this report does anything, let it remind us of this: the ecosystem is us. If we want it to be better, more inclusive, more connected, more ambitious, we each have a role to play in making that happen.

“So let’s keep listening. Let’s act with intent. And let’s build something Scotland can be proud of – together.”